Aboard the shuttle, Bev and I were lucky to meet Channel 933‘s on-air personality and Music Director, Frankie V, who shared his fun and wacky experience on the hill, which he documented on YouTube.
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Media Day at Big Bear Mountain Resorts!
Aboard the shuttle, Bev and I were lucky to meet Channel 933‘s on-air personality and Music Director, Frankie V, who shared his fun and wacky experience on the hill, which he documented on YouTube.
| Reactions: |
Friday, January 27, 2012
Get Customers “Pinterested” in your Brand
In the evolving world of social media, we see new and hyped social media platforms popping up each day. Some stick while others can barely make it off the ground. But the ones that do stick are spread far and wide until curiosity takes over and makes it a national phenomenon. Case in point: Pinterest. It’s hard to go a day without seeing Facebook status updates saying, “Pinterest is so addicting” or “Check out my latest pin.”| Reactions: |
Thursday, January 19, 2012
PIPA / SOPA: Potentially Dangerous Legislation
I woke up this morning to Nirvana’s song, "Smells like Teen Spirit." I felt inspired to research information about the song on the internet. I opened my laptop and navigated to Wikipedia. I typed the word “Nirvana” into the search bar. As soon as I hit the enter key, the page content turned black and I was left with nothing but a brief, yet stern message prompting me to write my congressman about stopping legislation that could potentially destroy the internet as we know it.
If you haven’t seen the many website blackouts or protests occurring over the past few days, you may be wondering what legislation is threatening to censor the internet. There are two bills at the cause of all this commotion, SOPA and PIPA.
What These Bills Are:
PIPA is the first of the two anti-piracy bills. Its acronym stands for the Protect IP Act. This bill was introduced to the Senate in May of 2011. If PIPA is passed, it will give U.S. corporations, mainly the entertainment, gaming, and software industries and the Federal Government the right to seek legal action with any website they feel is enabling copyright infringement. If this bill is passed, it will:
- Force U.S. internet providers to block access to websites deemed as enablers of copyright infringement
- Seek legal action by suing search engines, blog sites, directories, or any site in general to have the black listed sites removed from their website
- Will be able to force advertising agencies to remove websites from advertising accounts
- Companies will also have the power to sue any new websites that get started after these bills are passed, if they believe that they are not doing a good job of preventing infringement
SOPA stands for Stop Online Piracy Act and is a bill that was introduced to the U.S. House of Representatives in October of 2011. If SOPA is passed, it will work in conjunction with PIPA. Here are some highlights:
· The U.S. Attorney General will be able to force search engines, advertisers, DNS providers, servers, and payment processors from having any contact with alleged infringing websites
·SOPA will allow private corporations to create their own personal hit lists composed of websites they feel are breaking their copyright policies. These companies will be able to cut off all payments to the targeted website. The website of question will have five days to act before it is permanently taken down
How This Affects Internet Users:
Blogs can be blocked or shut down completely and the internet will become a witch-hunt for any possible copyright violation. These acts make it the blog owner’s responsibility for everything displayed on their site, including comments of visitors.
These acts are already stopping developers and start-up companies from innovating due to the bills causing a riskier legal climate. If these acts were around when the internet was first created, many websites we use today like Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, or SoundCloud would not exist. Basically any website that could be targeted as a place where online piracy might take place would not exist.
It is well known that the government has been under a lot of pressure to resolve the issues wrapped up in online piracy, and piracy has been a growing problem over the past ten years. But, this legislation has a high margin of error, mainly because it has been rushed. Google and Mozilla, two former supporters of the bill, have removed their sponsorship and are working hard to make sure the acts do not get passed.
One noted flaw involves lessened overall security for internet users. Also, it would cost the country $47 billion a year to uphold these bills, and sadly, they will not succeed in stopping piracy. That’s right. Instead of taking down piracy, the acts will take away freedom of speech, and forms of individualism. The illegal downloading of pirated content will still thrive. Posting a video of yourself singing a copyrighted song will get you sued, but illegally downloading that song by entering a websites IP address in lieu of its name, will still go unpunished.
These bills have sent a shock-wave through the nation. The best we can all do is stay informed. Check out this video describing some of the possible consequences of passing these bills. On that page, there is also information on how to vote against the acts.
Do you think these bills will censor internet users and stunt online innovation? Share your comments and feedback below.
| Reactions: |
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Shazam! Super Bowl Advertising
If you own a Smartphone, you are probably familiar with the app “Shazam.” For those of you who aren’t, Shazam is a mobile based music identification service. This service utilizes a mobile phone’s built-in microphone to gather a music sample. From that brief sample, song titles, artist, and lyric information is displayed for the user. The standard money maker for apps is mobile ads. The London based Shazam group has decided to venture beyond that facet of advertising and is prepared to enter the realm of “big money,” namely the television market.
The Super Bowl is an event known as much for its ground breaking advertising as it is for the game itself. Last year, Shazam was featured in one Super Bowl ad for Dockers. After that addition lead to positive consumer-to-brand interaction, this year up to one third of Super Bowl ad spots will use Shazam. These brands will amplify their ads with unique mobile content and valuable offers delivered to audiences in real-time.
Keep an eye out for Budweiser, Sony Pictures, and Pillsbury commercials. There will also be surprise brands using Shazam, mainly automotive and clothing companies. Campaigns that have a social call to action (Liking on Facebook, Following on Twitter etc.) have a 350 percent increase in consumer-to-brand interaction. That means that in the not so distant future, Shazam will definitely be more prevalent in the advertising community.
Would you use Shazam during the Super Bowl to interact with brands you love? Share your comments and feedback below.
| Reactions: |
Thursday, December 22, 2011
“Sponsored Ads” Coming to a Facebook Newsfeed Near You

In the last ten years advancements in internet technology and social tools changed the way the world communicates. Social networking sites connect advertisers to large groups of like-minded people. Advertising on Facebook and the controversy surrounding personal privacy is not new. All users have been exposed to the “tailored” ads that conveniently appear on the right hand side of the home page.
Facebook’s 800 million active users are about to get a new dose of targeted advertising. Starting in 2012, Facebook will insert “Sponsored Story” ads in user newsfeeds in an attempt to boost interaction with marketers. The ads will appear in the newsfeed just as other posts do, with the exception of being labeled “sponsored” in the bottom right-hand corner.
These ads are created around a user “liking” a brand’s fan page, “checking in” to a venue, or using an app, among other types of status updates. This is Facebook’s attempt to turn you and your friends’ activities into advertisements. For those of you in theTwitterverse, Sponsored Stories will be similar to Promoted Tweets on Twitter which run in the stream of updates or stories a user sees, and has the same look and feel as other posts.
I know what you’re thinking. “My newsfeed is going to get bombarded with an onslaught of advertisements!” All you Facebookers can relax. You will see no more than one Sponsored Story in your feed per day. Facebook plans to incorporate these ads gradually so they don’t infuriate users.
What is your opinion about ads in your Facebook newsfeed? Do you think users will view this change negatively? Leave your comments and feedback below.
Friday, December 9, 2011
Twitter’s Brand New Brand Page
Today, Twitter is set to unveil redesigned brand pages. These pages are geared toward strengthening Twitter’s relationship with the advertising community. Twitter has a version of brand pages at the moment, but they have been overshadowed by the overly-hyped Google+ brand pages which went live last month. Chief Revenue Officer Adam Bain states that "marketing officers across the country constantly request the addition of user-friendly brand pages." Those marketers are finally getting what they asked for. With the current format, branded elements of the page design are usually covered by the tweet-timeline. With the redesign, there are customizable pages with large header images where advertisers can display their logos and taglines. Brands also have the option of keeping their most salient tweets at the top of the timeline. That top tweet can also auto-expand and reveal an embedded photo or video from Flikr or Youtube. Customer-service oriented brands such as JetBlue want a way to respond to multiple tweets without having their message diluted. This is achievable with the new layout because Twitter will separate out a brand’s @ replies and mentions.
Tweets are limited to 140 characters. It’s no surprise that a Twitter user is unable to learn the nuances of a company with that small of an interaction. Brand pages can be considered an extension of knowledge. If a particular tweet speaks to a user, they can satisfy their curiosity by clicking on the company’s brand page, and indulging themselves with more detailed information.
So far, 21 marketers are set to launch brand pages. Some examples are: American Express, Best Buy, Chevrolet, General Electric, Disney, Hewlett-Packard, Verizon, and Nike. These companies already actively distribute content on Twitter. Their goal with brand pages is to look for a way to make that content stand out better.
The launch of brand pages is a large step forward for Twitter. This venture could be viewed as an attempt to compete with Facebook as the secondary branding destination for a company, after its own website.
Do you think that Twitter’s new brand page has potential for widespread success? If the brand page was avail bile to all Twitter users, would you create one? Share your comments below.
| Reactions: |
Monday, November 21, 2011
Google Introduces Music Component

Google strives to be much more than a standard search engine, and has achieved that on many levels by evolving and staying on top of trends. When they released Google+ this past July, the people at Google were hoping it would be a social media giant that would rival the likes of Facebook. However, it has failed to take off as hoped and many (including us) got bored with it after the initial hype. Google is hoping to make waves again by reaching into the music market and providing its users with an alternative to iTunes.
Google Music will be integrated into Android phones, which is the world’s number one operating smartphone system and powers roughly 200 million devices worldwide. Google Music already has over 13 million songs in their system that will be available through various internet-connected devices.
Google Music is hoping to distinguish itself from other music sites by utilizing Google+ and allowing users to share purchased music with friends. This doesn’t mean users can buy a song and friends can steal it to load on music devices. It basically means that Google+ users will get “free, full play” of songs purchased by friends. You can also access your music on any of your devices at anytime. You never have to worry about synching or being online.
I think it’s great that they’re adding the music component and working with Android phones. This will be the greatest competitive advantage over iTunes in my opinion. However, I’m not sure how Google Music will ultimately be able to compete with iTunes and other social music sites on non-mobile platforms. A differentiator they’re touting is the ability to share on Google+. Google+ seems to be having a tough time breaking into the every day social media world. If I wanted to hear a song in its entirety, I can go to YouTube, Pandora, Turntable, Spotify or Blip.
What are your thoughts on Google Music and how do you think they can make their mark in the online musical world? Leave your thoughts below!
| Reactions: |


